Crosier v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Edna Jane Crosier |
Wells Fargo Bank, NA |
2:2019cv00780 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
R David Proctor |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Edna Jane Crosier (Lay, Kenneth) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File amended complaint by Edna Jane Crosier. (Lay, Kenneth) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Brief in Support filed by Edna Jane Crosier. (Lay, Kenneth) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT Case Reassigned to Judge R David Proctor. Magistrate Judge John H England, III no longer assigned to the case. Please use case number 2:19-cv-00780-RDP for all subsequent pleadings. The status conference set for 7/8/19 is CANCELLED. (AFS) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Discovery by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Rummage, Ryan) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Brief in Support by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Mortgage, #2 Exhibit 2 - Note)(Rummage, Ryan) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion to Dismiss Complaint Motion is RIPE 5/31/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Rummage, Ryan) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint Motion is RIPE 5/28/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Rummage, Ryan) |
Filing Fee received from Reid S Manley in the amount of $400.00, credit card receipt_number 1126-3353402; USDC receipt number B4601097920; related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wells Fargo Bank, NA from Circuit Court of Shelby County, Alabama, case number 58-cv-2019-900401.00., filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(AFS). (Manley, Reid) Modified on 5/23/2019 (KWC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wells Fargo Bank, NA from Circuit Court of Shelby County, Alabama, case number 58-cv-2019-900401.00., filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crosier v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edna Jane Crosier | |
Represented By: | Kenneth J Lay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, NA | |
Represented By: | Ryan Sikes Rummage |
Represented By: | Reid S Manley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.