Evans v. Adams et al
| Bryant Evans |
| George Adams and Christopher Gordy |
| 2:2019cv00818 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The plaintiff was instructed he must correct his deficient pleading within thirty (30) days and that the failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this action. (Id.). That time has elapsed, and the plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order of June 10, 2019.Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to the plaintiffs failure to prosecute.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 7/22/2019. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - The plaintiffs complaint is deficient for the reason indicated below. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this order, in the manner explained. The plaintiff failed to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $350.00 and administrative fee of $50.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 6/10/2019. (KEK)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George Adams, Christopher Gordy, filed by Bryant Evans.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
