Southern Research Institute v. PAM Innovation Corporation et al
| Southern Research Institute |
| Parshu Ram Nirangan Shastri and PAM Innovation Corporation |
| 2:2019cv00932 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Dr. Parshu Ram Nirangan Shastri a/k/a Peter N. Shastri, CEO, Secretary, CFO, and Sole Director of PAM Innovation Corp. on August 7, 2019, filed by Southern Research Institute. (Pereyda, Christian) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Dr. Parshu Ram Nirangan Shastri a/k/a Dr. Peter N. Shastri on August 7, 2019, filed by Southern Research Institute. (Pereyda, Christian) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PAM Innovation Corporation, Parshu Ram Nirangan Shastri. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number B4601098541. (KEK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PAM Innovation Corporation, Parshu Ram Nirangan Shastri, filed by Southern Research Institute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
