Woodham v. Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The et al
| Jonathan Woodham |
| Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The and Corridor Group Inc, The |
| 2:2019cv00940 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 7/31/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER: telephone status conference set for 11:00 a.m. on July 31, 2019, is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 7/31/2019. (MSN)
|
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (MRR, ) |
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER: A telephone status conference is currently set for 11:00 a.m. on July 31, 2019. (Doc. #10 ). The parties are REMINDED that the status conference will be cancelled by separate order if, prior to the date of the conference, all parties submit forms indicating whether they consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 7/29/2019. (MSN)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than September 3, 2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after September 3, 2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 11:00 a.m. on July 31, 2019. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 7/18/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 7/18/19. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John W Sheffield on behalf of Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The, Corridor Group Inc, The (Sheffield, John) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The, Corridor Group Inc, The. filed by Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The, Corridor Group Inc, The (Sheffield, John) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The, Corridor Group Inc, The.(Scott, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan Woodham. Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The served on 6/28/2019, answer due 7/19/2019. (Blizzard, H) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan Woodham. Corridor Group Inc, The served on 6/28/2019, answer due 7/19/2019. (Blizzard, H) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The, Corridor Group Inc, The, returned to pltf for service (MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Request for service by certified mail within the body of the complaint filed by Jonathan Woodham. (MRR, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number B4601098554 (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corridor Group Holdings LLC, The, Corridor Group Inc, The, filed by Jonathan Woodham.(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
