Thrasher v. Adams et al
| Christopher M Thrasher, Michael Hillman and Michael Thrasher |
| Warden III Christopher Gordy, George Adams, Commissioner Jefferson S Dunn and Thomas Woodfin |
| 2:2019cv01007 |
| June 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| John E Ott |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Christopher M. Thrasher. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 8/22/2019. (AFS)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER CONSENT FORM by Christopher M Thrasher (AFS)
|
|
Initial Filing fee: $50.01, receipt number B4601099990 (AFS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee in the amount of $3.64, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 7/12/2019. (AFS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher M Thrasher. (AFS)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against George Adams, Jefferson S Dunn, Christopher Gordy, Thomas Woodfin, filed by Christopher M Thrasher.(AFS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
