Miller v. Young et al
Plaintiff: Tiffany Miller
Defendant: Donald Young and S A T Trucking Inc
Case Number: 2:2019cv01114
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Remand re #10 Order Remanding Case. (JLC)
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court and this case is hereby REMANDED to the Jefferson County Circuit Court in accordance with the #9 Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/23/2019. (JLC)
August 23, 2019 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/23/2019. (JLC)
August 5, 2019 Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Movant's Initial Reply Submission In Response To Ex B of The Court's Order filed by Tiffany Miller. (Buck, Rachel)
August 1, 2019 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3403116. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by S A T Trucking Inc from Jefferson County Circuit Court - Bessemer Div, case number 68-cv-2019-900494., filed by S A T Trucking Inc.(KAM). (Holtsford, Alex)
July 31, 2019 Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by S A T Trucking Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Holtsford, Alex)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/22/2019. (KEK)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. (Doc. # 4). The parties SHALL brief the issues raised by the Motion in accordance with Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part of this order as if fully set out herein. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/22/2019. (KAM)
July 19, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Tiffany Miller. (Buck, Rachel)
July 17, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by S A T Trucking Inc. filed by S A T Trucking Inc (Holtsford, Alex)
July 17, 2019 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by S A T Trucking Inc.(Holtsford, Alex)
July 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by S A T Trucking Inc from Jefferson County Circuit Court - Bessemer Div, case number 68-cv-2019-900494., filed by S A T Trucking Inc.(KAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Young et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S A T Trucking Inc
Represented By: Alex Lafayette Holtsford, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Miller
Represented By: Frank S Buck
Represented By: Rachel Catherine Buck
Represented By: James Brooks Leach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?