Gates et al v. Smaxwell
Plaintiff: Jessica Gates and Connie Gates
Defendant: Ashley Smaxwell
Case Number: 2:2019cv01216
Filed: July 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. #7 .) Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the hearing set for Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 2:30 PM is cancelled. Costs are taxed as paid. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/24/2019. (KEK)
September 23, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Connie Gates. (Perkins, Byron)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint #5 and a proposed Amended Complaint ( #5 -1). It appears that Plaintiffs have failed to sufficiently demonstrate that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action because the amount in controversy is not apparent from the Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to appear and present sufficient evidence to demonstrate the amount in controversy on Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 2:30 PM in the Hugo L. Black U.S. Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 8/30/2019. (PSM)
August 19, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Connie Gates. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)(Perkins, Byron)
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 8/14/19. (LAS2)
August 13, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time by Connie Gates. (Perkins, Byron)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER - Plaintiffs have failed to sufficiently demonstrate that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action because the amount in controversy is not apparent from their complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have eleven (11) days from the date of this Order to amend their complaint to sufficiently establish that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. If Plaintiffs fail to do so, this case will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 8/2/2019. (KEK)
July 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ashley Smaxwell, filed by Connie Gates, Jessica Gates.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gates et al v. Smaxwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Gates
Represented By: Byron R Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Gates
Represented By: Byron R Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley Smaxwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?