Moore v. Jones et al
Charles Eugene Moore |
C.O. Donald Scott, Warden Gwendolyn Givens, Lt L Scott, Captain Gary Malone and Warden Karla Jones |
2:2019cv01387 |
August 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
Abdul K Kallon |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER re SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING; Plaintiff's pleading is deficient for the reasons indicated. Plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this Order in the manner explained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(JLC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Inmate account info by Charles Eugene Moore. (JLC) |
Filing 3 Request by Charles Eugene Moore. (JLC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - The plaintiffs complaint is deficient for the reason(s) indicated below. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this order, in the manner explained below. The plaintiff failed to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $350 and administrative fee of $50. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/28/2019. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gwendolyn Givens, Karla Jones, Gary Malone, Donald Scott, L Scott, filed by Charles Eugene Moore.(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.