Moore v. Storey et al
| Charles Eugene Moore |
| J Howard, Gwendolyn Givens, Radarius Storey, Karla Jones and Luitze |
| 2:2019cv01389 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Corey L Maze |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER that within 30 days from the entry date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or pay the filing fee of $350 plus the administrative fee of $50. Failure to correct the deficient pleading may result in this case being dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(JLC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Inmate account info by Charles Eugene Moore. (JLC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. If the plaintiff fails to correct the deficient pleading in compliance with this notice within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this notice, the court may dismiss this case for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(SRD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gwendolyn Givens, J Howard, Karla Jones, Luitze, Radarius Storey, filed by Charles Eugene Moore.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
