Willingham v. Colonial Pipeline Company et al
| Beverly Kay Willingham |
| Colonial Pipeline Company and Superior Land Designs LLC |
| 2:2019cv01507 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| R David Proctor |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Defendant's ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Superior Land Designs LLC.(Bolvig, C) |
Filing 14
ORDER the parties are ORDERED to confer and submit a joint report by November 22,2019 in accordance with the directions of the court. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/23/2019. Associated Cases: 2:19-cv-00923-RDP, 2:18-cv-01121-RDP, 2:19-cv-01507-RDP(KAM)
|
| Filing 13 Colonial Pipeline Company's ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Colonial Pipeline Company.(Barley, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT : this case is reassigned to Judge Judge R David Proctor and consolidated with 2:18-cv-1121-RDP Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala no longer assigned to the case. (KAM) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER After careful consideration and with the consent of the Magistrate Judges, the cases pending in the Northern District of Alabama SHALL be consolidated before the undersigned. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/11/2019. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-01121-JHE, 2:19-cv-00923-RDP, 2:19-cv-01507-MHH(KAM)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Beverly Kay Willingham.(Andrews, D) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Ms. Willingham must cure the deficient jurisdictional allegations before the Court may determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1653 (Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended, upon terms, in the trial or appellate courts.). Consequently, within 14 days, Ms. Willingham shall please file an amended complaint that sufficiently indicates her citizenship, Mr. Willingham's citizenship at the time of his death, and the citizenship of Superior Land Designs, LLC. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 10/11/2019. (KEK)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Reassignment- Because the parties have not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Madeline Hughes Haikala. Please use case number 2:19-cv-1507-MHH on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden no longer assigned to the case. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Colonial Pipeline Company.(Barley, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Superior Land Designs LLC.(Bolvig, C) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Beverly Kay Willingham. Superior Land Designs LLC served on 9/18/2019, answer due 10/9/2019. (Andrews, D) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Beverly Kay Willingham. Colonial Pipeline Company served on 9/18/2019, answer due 10/9/2019. (Andrews, D) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Colonial Pipeline Company, Superior Land Designs LLC., returned (in SASE) to pltf for service (MRR, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3432428 (B4601100564). related document #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Beverly Kay Willingham.(MRR, ). (Andrews, D) Modified on 9/13/2019 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Beverly Kay Willingham.(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
