Reese v. Givens et al
| Lorenzo Reese |
| Gwendolyn Givens and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The |
| 2:2019cv01531 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Order by Lorenzo Reese. (KAM) |
Filing 5
ORDER that the court deems this case ripe for summary disposition, the petitioner shall have 20 days to supply any additional evidentiary materials. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/23/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 4 Respondents' ANSWER to Complaint by Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The, Gwendolyn Givens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Davis, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John J Davis on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The, Gwendolyn Givens (Davis, John) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE within 20 days why the relief requested should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 10/20/2019.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/30/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5. rec# B4601100648), filed by Lorenzo Reese.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
