BBVA USA Bancshares Inc v. Bandy et al
BBVA USA Bancshares Inc |
Deontray McClain, Leyshun D Bandy, Rodneisha C Jackson and Belton Eugene Nettles |
2:2019cv01548 |
September 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Staci G Cornelius |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Alias Summons Issued as to Belton Eugene Nettles, returned to pltf for service (MRR, ) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Rodneisha C Jackson, returned to pltf for service (MRR, ) |
Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted- Unclaimed as to Rodneisha C Jackson. (MRR, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Deontray McClain served (no date on green card) (MRR, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Belton Eugene Nettles served (no date on green card) (MRR, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Leyshun D Bandy served on 9/28/2019, answer due 10/19/2019. (MRR, ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, sent via certified mail (MRR, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BBVA USA Bancshares Inc.(MRR, ) |
Request for service by certified mail within the body of the complaint filed by BBVA USA Bancshares Inc. (MRR, ) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number B4601100687 (MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.