Carter v. Armstrong & Associates
Lisa Carter |
Armstrong & Associates |
2:2019cv01760 |
October 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Armstrong & Associates. filed by Armstrong & Associates (Armstrong, Gordon) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint by Armstrong & Associates.(Armstrong, Gordon) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER finding as moot #6 the motion to dismiss in light of Plaintiff's filing of the #11 amended complaint. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 12/2/2019. (RLW) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lisa Carter.(Seals, W) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER. Plaintiff Lisa Carter has filed #8 a motion to amend her complaint. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), a party may amend her pleading once without permission from the court within 21 days of service of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). Defendant filed its Rule 12(b) motion on November 22, 2019, meaning that Ms. Carter may amend her complaint as a matter of course, and her motion to amend is MOOT. Ms. Carter must file the amended complaint as a separate docket entry by December 13, 2019. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 12/2/2019. (RLW) |
Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/27/19. (SAC) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Lisa Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Seals, W) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 12(b)(6), FRCP filed by Lisa Carter. (Seals, W) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 12(b)(6), FRCP by Armstrong & Associates. (Armstrong, Gordon) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gordon G Armstrong, III on behalf of Armstrong & Associates (Armstrong, Gordon) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lisa Carter. Armstrong & Associates served(no date on green card). (KEK) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Armstrong & Associates. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Lisa Carter. (Seals, W) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3468287 (ALND B4601101675) related document #1 COMPLAINT against Armstrong & Associates, filed by Lisa Carter.(KEK). (Seals, W) Modified on 11/1/2019 (KEK). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Armstrong & Associates, filed by Lisa Carter.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carter v. Armstrong & Associates | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa Carter | |
Represented By: | W Whitney Seals |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Armstrong & Associates | |
Represented By: | Gordon G Armstrong, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.