Lacey et al v. American Honda Motor Company Inc
| Teri N Lacey and Charles P Lacey, Jr |
| American Honda Motor Company Inc |
| 2:2019cv01796 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 12/8/19. (SAC)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by American Honda Motor Company Inc. filed by American Honda Motor Company Inc (Harlow, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by American Honda Motor Company Inc.(Harlow, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by American Honda Motor Company Inc from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2019-904368, filed by American Honda Motor Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(KEK) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3471911 (ALND B4601101817) related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by American Honda Motor Company Inc from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2019-904368, filed by American Honda Motor Company Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(KEK). (Harlow, Anthony) Modified on 11/5/2019 (KEK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
