Davis v. Regions Bank
| Laquita Davis |
| Regions Bank |
| 2:2019cv01798 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John E Ott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER regarding compliance with Rule 26; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/3/2020; Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 12/30/2019. (BST, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER that the parties are reminded that this case will be reassigned to a district judge on 2/3/2020 unless they unanimously consent to jurisdiction by the undersigned magistrate; Telephone Conference set for 1/21/2020 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge John E. Ott; parties to call in as directed; if all parties submit an executed form 24 hours in advance, the telephone conference will be cancelled; Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 12/30/2019. (BST, )
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Regions Bank.(Starling, M) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Regions Bank answer due 12/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E. Ott on 12/17/2019. (SJB)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Motion is RIPE 12/16/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Regions Bank. (Jones, Irving) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Answer now due by 12/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E. Ott on 12/9/2019. (SJB)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Motion is RIPE 11/27/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Regions Bank. (Starling, M) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laquita Davis. Regions Bank served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (KAM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Regions Bank mailed certified mail (KAM) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3472205. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Regions Bank, filed by Laquinta Davis.(KAM). (Camp, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Laquinta Davis. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Regions Bank, filed by Laquinta Davis.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Regions Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laquita Davis | |
| Represented By: | Robert J Camp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Regions Bank | |
| Represented By: | M Jefferson Starling, III |
| Represented By: | Irving W Jones, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
