Underwood v. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc et al
Plaintiff: Dedrick Underwood
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Case Number: 2:2019cv01861
Filed: November 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: The defendants' unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. #5 ). The defendants SHALL respond to the complaint by January 24, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/2/2020. (KEK)
December 31, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E Turner on behalf of Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc (Turner, Michael)
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Motion is RIPE 12/30/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc. (McGivaren, Crawford)
December 16, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dedrick Underwood. Norfolk Southern Corporation served on 12/13/2019, answer due 1/3/2020; Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc served on 12/13/2019, answer due 1/3/2020. (KEK)
December 10, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc., sent via certified mail (MRR, )
November 20, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, )
November 20, 2019 Request for service by certified mail within the body of the complaint filed by Dedrick Underwood. (MRR, )
November 20, 2019 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3481936 (B4601102174). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc, filed by Dedrick Underwood.(KEK). (Leonard, Heather) Modified on 11/20/2019 (MRR, ).
November 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc, filed by Dedrick Underwood.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Underwood v. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railroad Company Inc
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: Michael E Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: Michael E Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dedrick Underwood
Represented By: Heather N Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?