Wedgeworth v. United States of America
Petitioner: Tiffany Wedgeworth
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv08039
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Karon O Bowdre
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Response by the United States to Wedgeworth's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence) by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O)(Atwood, Melissa)
November 19, 2019 Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Tiffany Wedgeworth re #7 Order. (JLC)
November 14, 2019 Filing 9 Mail Returned as Return to sender. Mail sent to Tiffany Wedgeworth re #2 Order. (JLC)
November 4, 2019 Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Tiffany Wedgeworth re Notice of Filing. (JLC)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #4 MOTION for Ruling on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Court FINDS that Ms. Wedgeworth has waived the Attorney-Client Privilege as to the matters raised in her Habeas Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 10/29/2019. (JLC)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS the Government's Motion for Extension of Time" (doc. 5) to respond to the court's Order to Show Cause (doc. 2). The Government's response is now due on or before December 3, 2019. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Text Order to Ms. Wedgeworth at her address listed in her habeas motion. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 10/29/19. (MMW)
October 28, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time by United States of America. (Atwood, Melissa)
October 24, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Ruling on Attorney-Client Privilege (Unopposed) by Tiffany Wedgeworth. (Butler, Kevin)
October 24, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa Kay Atwood on behalf of United States of America (Atwood, Melissa)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; It is hereby ORDERED that the Government APPEAR and SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before November 12, 2019, why the Court should not grant the relief requested by Ms. Wedgeworth. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 10/21/2019. (JLC)
October 16, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Tiffany Wedgeworth.(JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wedgeworth v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tiffany Wedgeworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Jay E Town, US Attorney
Represented By: Lane H Woodke
Represented By: John B Felton
Represented By: Melissa Kay Atwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?