American Contractors Indemnity Company v. Safford Building Company LLC et al
American Contractors Indemnity Company |
Safford Building Company LLC, Clifford Safford and Yvonne Safford |
2:2020cv00069 |
January 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
R David Proctor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by American Contractors Indemnity Company. Safford Building Company LLC served on 2/13/2020, answer due 3/5/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - This Order shall expire sixty (60) days from the date of its entry unless extended by joint request or by the Court for good cause shown. All rights and defenses of the Parties with respect to ACIC's claim for injunctive relief are fully reserved. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 2/14/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Clifford Safford, Yvonne Safford, Safford Building Company LLC Limited Appearance (Yearout, Jason) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Safford Building Company LLC. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by American Contractors Indemnity Company re #3 Amended Complaint, NOTICE OF FILING SUMMONS TO SAFFORD BUILDING COMPANY (Stiff, L) |
Filing 9 Summons Returned Unexecuted by American Contractors Indemnity Company as to Safford Building Company LLC. (KEK) |
Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted by American Contractors Indemnity Company as to Safford Building Company LLC. (JLC) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Clifford Safford, Yvonne Safford and Safford Building Company LLC via certified U.S. Mail on this the 17th day of January, 2020. (JLC) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR SERVICE VIA CERTIFIED MAIL by American Contractors Indemnity Company re #3 Amended Complaint. (Stiff, L) Modified on 1/17/2020 (JLC). |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: This case is reassigned to Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala. Judge R David Proctor no longer assigned to the case. (KAM) (KAM, ). |
Motions No Longer Referred: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order; Case reassigned at the direction of the court (KAM) |
Filing 4 Brief re #3 Amended Complaint, Memorandum in Support of Complaint and Brief in Support of Application for TRO. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Stiff, L) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by American Contractors Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G)(Stiff, L) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Clifford Safford, Yvonne Safford, Safford Building Company LLC. mailed certified mail (KAM) |
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order REFERRED to Judge Liles C. Burke (KAM) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601103414 (KAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clifford Safford, Yvonne Safford, Safford Building Company LLC, filed by American Contractors Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(KEK) |
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (filed within complaint #1 , page 4); and MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (filed within complaint #1 , page 6) by American Contractors Indemnity Company. (KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.