Daniel v. Shelby County Jail et al
| Antuone Decarlo Daniel |
| Shelby County Jail, Nelson, Deputy Summers and Biard |
| 2:2020cv00143 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable (Not Incarcerated). Mail, Order Doc 5, sent to Antuone Decarlo Daniel (MRR, ) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that #1 Complaint filed by Antuone Decarlo Daniel be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute; Objections to R&R due by 3/30/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 3/16/2020. (KAM) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Antuone Decarlo Daniel (KAM) |
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 2/3/2020. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antuone Decarlo Daniel. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Biard, Nelson, Shelby County Jail, Summers, filed by Antuone Decarlo Daniel.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
