Fairfield, City of, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
Fairfield, City of, Alabama |
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Purdue Frederick Company Inc, Allergan PLC, Cephalon Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD, Purdue Pharma Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Noramco Inc, Cardinal Health Inc, Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma Inc and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc |
2:2020cv00202 |
February 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Fairfield, City of, Alabama as to Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. (KEK) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. Endo Health Solutions Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Mallinckrodt LLC served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; McKesson Corporation served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Noramco Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Purdue Pharma LP served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. Actavis LLC served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Cephalon Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; The Purdue Frederick Company Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. Cardinal Health Inc served on 2/29/2020, answer due 3/21/2020; Johnson & Johnson served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Purdue Pharma Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020; Watson Laboratories Inc served on 3/2/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 6 ORDER Transferring Case to MDL: ORDER of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring this case to the District of Ohio Northern for inclusion in MDL; certified copy of docket entries and documents requested by transferee clerk transferred to Clerk of Court in District of Ohio Northern. (KEK) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. Actavis Pharma Inc served on 2/28/2020, answer due 3/20/2020; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc served on 2/28/2020, answer due 3/20/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. (KEK) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama.(KEK) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3536338. related document #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Fairfield, City of, Alabama.(KEK). (Sutton, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.