Crisler v. Giles et al
Plaintiff: Lafacial Crisler
Defendant: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC and Ronald Shawn Giles
Case Number: 2:2020cv00245
Filed: February 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: John H England
Referring Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2020 Filing 23 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hall, David)
April 16, 2020 Filing 22 RESPONSE in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss And Memorandum Of Law filed by Ronald Shawn Giles, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC. (Hall, David)
April 10, 2020 Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss And Memorandum Of Law filed by Lafacial Crisler. (Middlemas, Davis)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 4/6/2020. (KAM)
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/27/2020. (KAM)
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TEXT ORDER- This matter is before the court on Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss #5 . Plaintiff SHALL submit responsive briefing on or before April 10, 2020. Defendants may submit a reply brief on or before April 17, 2020. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/27/2020. (KAM)
March 26, 2020 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Hipaa Order by Ronald Shawn Giles, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Protective Order)(Hall, David)
March 25, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. Please use case number 2:20-cv-245-RDP on all subsequent pleadings.(AKD)
March 25, 2020 NOTICE: Telephone Conference set for March 30, 2020 is CANCELLED. (AKD)
March 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's response is due by March 20, 2020. Defendants' reply, if any, is due by March 27, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 3/11/2020. (CDG)
March 11, 2020 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Motion is RIPE 3/11/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Lafacial Crisler. (Middlemas, Davis)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: Any opposition to #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer was due by March 6, 2020. No opposition has been filed. Therefore, that motion is GRANTED as unopposed. Defendants' obligation to answer the complaint is suspended while their partial motion to dismiss, (doc. #5 ), remains pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 3/10/2020. (CDG)
March 10, 2020 Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ronald Shawn Giles. filed by Ronald Shawn Giles (Taylor, Bert)
March 2, 2020 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ronald Shawn Giles. filed by Ronald Shawn Giles (Taylor, Bert)
February 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 02/28/2020. (AKD)
February 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than April 13, 2020. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after April 13, 2020. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for March 30, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-873-8017 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 4577302. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 02/28/2020. (AKD)
February 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER setting motion deadline re #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Any opposition is due by March 6, 2020. Defendant's obligation to answer the complaint is suspended while the motion for extension of time remains pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 2/28/2020. (CDG)
February 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER setting motion deadline re #5 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's response is due by March 13, 2020. Defendants' reply, if any, is due by March 20, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 2/28/2020. (CDG)
February 28, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Motion is RIPE 2/28/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Ronald Shawn Giles, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC. (Hall, David)
February 28, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss And Memorandum Of Law by Ronald Shawn Giles, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC. (Hall, David)
February 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bert P Taylor on behalf of Ronald Shawn Giles (Taylor, Bert)
February 25, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD)
February 25, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Ronald Shawn Giles, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC (AKD)
February 25, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, Ronald Shawn Giles from Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama, case number 68-CV-2020-900045.00., filed by Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, Ronald Shawn Giles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(AKD)
February 25, 2020 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3543644 (B4601104315). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, Ronald Shawn Giles from Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama, case number 68-CV-2020-900045.00., filed by Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, Ronald Shawn Giles. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(AKD). (Hall, David) Modified on 2/26/2020 (AKD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crisler v. Giles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC
Represented By: David Baker Hall
Represented By: Nathan Baker Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Shawn Giles
Represented By: David Baker Hall
Represented By: Nathan Baker Hall
Represented By: Bert P Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lafacial Crisler
Represented By: Davis L Middlemas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?