Thomas v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Plaintiff: Dr Clark Thomas, PC
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Case Number: 2:2020cv00895
Filed: June 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Anna M Manasco
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL- This matter comes before the court upon the Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Doc. #27 . Upon consideration thereof, the court ORDERS that this case be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/13/20. (MRR, )
October 9, 2020 Filing 27 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice by Clark Thomas, PC (Buck, Brannon) Modified text on 10/9/2020 (MRR, ).
October 9, 2020 Filing 26 REPLY Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint re #22 filed by Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Dowd, Augusta) Modified text on 10/9/2020 (MRR, ).
October 5, 2020 Filing 25 Joint NOTICE of JPML Ruling by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, Dr. Clark Thomas PC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dowd, Augusta) Modified text and added filer on 10/6/2020 (MRR, ).
September 28, 2020 Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Clark Thomas, PC. (Buck, Brannon)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 TEXT ORDER- This case is before the court on Defendant's motion to dismiss. Doc. #21 . Any response by Plaintiff is due on or before SEPTEMBER 28, 2020. Plaintiff's brief in response is limited to thirty-five pages exclusive of any exhibits. Any reply by Defendant is limited to ten pages and must be filed on or before OCTOBER 12, 2020. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/2/20. (MRR, )
September 2, 2020 Set Deadlines as to #21 MOTION to Dismiss Responses due by 9/28/2020 Replies due by 10/12/2020. (MRR, )
August 31, 2020 Filing 22 Brief re #21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Dowd, Augusta)
August 31, 2020 Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. (Dowd, Augusta)
August 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TEXT ORDER- This case is before the court on Defendant's motion to stay all proceedings in this case except for pleading practice and motion practice related to the pleadings. Doc. #18 . The motion is GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED to notify the court within two business days of any relevant ruling by the JPML. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 8/28/20. (MRR, )
August 21, 2020 Filing 19 RESPONSE to #18 MOTION to Stay filed by Clark Thomas, PC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order)(Buck, Brannon) Modified text on 8/21/2020 (MRR, ).
August 21, 2020 Filing 18 Opposed MOTION to Stay by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dowd, Augusta) Modified text on 8/21/2020 (MRR, ).
August 17, 2020 Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, filed by Clark Thomas, PC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A part 1, #2 Exhibit A part 2, #3 Exhibit A part 3, #4 Exhibit A part 4)(Buck, Brannon)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER- The court's independent review of pltf's complaint reveals that it is an impermissible shotgun pleading, the court STRIKES the complaint and ORDERS pltf to replead on or before August 17, 2020, in conformity with FRCP 8(a)(2) and 10(b), as well as the Eleventh Circuit's instructions about properly pleading a complaint; The deft's motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 7/30/20. (MRR, )
July 27, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by William Chambers Waller, IV on behalf of Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Waller, William)
July 27, 2020 Filing 14 Brief re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Dowd, Augusta)
July 27, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. (Dowd, Augusta)
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER- The Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, Doc. #11 , is GRANTED. The Defendant shall file its response to the complaint on or before July 27, 2020. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 7/17/20. (MRR, )
July 17, 2020 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dowd, Augusta)
July 8, 2020 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Dowd, Augusta)
July 1, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig A. Shirley on behalf of Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Shirley, Craig)
July 1, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Augusta S Dowd on behalf of Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Dowd, Augusta)
July 1, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clark Thomas, PC. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. (MRR, )
June 26, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, sent via certified mail (MRR, )
June 25, 2020 Filing 5 Notice of Reassignment- The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Anna M. Manasco. Please use case number 2:20-895-AMM on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius no longer assigned to the case. (MRR, )
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER- The undersigned hereby RECUSES herself from the above-captioned matter; The Clerk is DIRECTED to REASSIGN this matter to a randomly selected judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 6/25/20. (MRR, )
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, )
June 25, 2020 Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Clark Thomas, PC. (MRR, )
June 25, 2020 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3617330 (B4601106766). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, filed by Clark Thomas, PC.(MRR, ). (Buck, Brannon) Modified on 6/25/2020 (MRR, ).
June 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, filed by Clark Thomas, PC.(MRR, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr Clark Thomas, PC
Represented By: Brannon J Buck
Represented By: Brett Andrew Ialacci
Represented By: Christopher B Driver
Represented By: Lance Leroy Goodson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Represented By: William Chambers Waller, IV
Represented By: Augusta S Dowd
Represented By: Craig A. Shirley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?