Bryant v. HUDA Logistics et al
Jonathan M Bryant |
HUDA Logistics and Abdelsalam G Keila |
2:2020cv01044 |
July 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Defendant Abdelsalam Keila ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Abdelsalam G Keila.(Allison, Russell) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HUDA Logistics. filed by HUDA Logistics (Allison, Russell) |
Filing 6 HUDA Logistics' ANSWER to #1 Complaint by HUDA Logistics.(Allison, Russell) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HUDA Logistics, Abdelsalam G Keila. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jonathan M Bryant. filed by Jonathan M Bryant (DiLorenzo, Heidi) |
Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Jonathan M Bryant. (DiLorenzo, Heidi) |
Filing 2 HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2020. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 7/27/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HUDA Logistics, Abdelsalam G Keila, filed by Jonathan M Bryant.(KEK) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3635403 (ALND B4601107332) related document #1 COMPLAINT against HUDA Logistics, Abdelsalam G Keila, filed by Jonathan M Bryant.(KEK). (DiLorenzo, Heidi) Modified on 7/24/2020 (KEK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.