Haywood v. United of Omaha Insurance Company et al
| Donnie Haywood |
| Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC and United of Omaha Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv01195 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| R David Proctor |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by United of Omaha Insurance Company.(Johnson, John) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United of Omaha Insurance Company, filed by Donnie Haywood.(Pennington, John) |
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted (not deliverable as addressed unable to forward) by Donnie Haywood as to Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC. (MEB2) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC, United of Omaha Insurance Company. Mailed certified mail. (MEB2) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3654351 (ALND R# B4601107896) related document #1 COMPLAINT against Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC, United of Omaha Insurance Company, filed by Donnie Haywood.(KAM). (Pennington, John) Modified on 8/20/2020 (MEB2). |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Donnie Haywood. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephens Pipe & Steel LLC, United of Omaha Insurance Company, filed by Donnie Haywood.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
