Cotney v. National Healthcare Collections LLC
Tanya Cotney |
National Healthcare Collections LLC |
2:2020cv01350 |
September 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Staci G Cornelius |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: The plaintiff has filed a notice indicating she has settled her claims against the defendant, and requesting this action be stayed until she files a notice of dismissal on or before December 14, 2020. (Doc. #9 ). The plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, and this action is STAYED through December 14, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/13/20. (MRR, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Tanya Cotney of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tanya Cotney. National Healthcare Collections LLC served on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/12/2020. (MRR, ) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to National Healthcare Collections LLC. Mailed certified mail (MEB2) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: The motion for admission pro hac vice of David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps (Doc. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/11/20. (MRR, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford W Botes on behalf of Tanya Cotney (Botes, Bradford) |
Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice- David J Philipps and Mary E. Philipps Motion is RIPE 9/10/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Tanya Cotney. (Attachments: #1 Consent of local counsel)(MRR, ) Modified on 9/10/2020 (MRR, ). |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Tanya Cotney. (MRR, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Healthcare Collections LLC, filed by Tanya Cotney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(MRR, ) |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3669233 (B4601108378). (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/11/2020 (MRR, ). |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3669209 (B4601108376). related document #1 COMPLAINT against National Healthcare Collections LLC, filed by Tanya Cotney. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(MRR, ). (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/11/2020 (MRR, ). |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3669232 (B4601108377). (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/11/2020 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cotney v. National Healthcare Collections LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Healthcare Collections LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tanya Cotney | |
Represented By: | Bradford W Botes |
Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.