Davis v. O'Neil Transportation Services Inc
| Jennifer Davis |
| O'Neil Transportation Services Inc |
| 2:2020cv01390 |
| September 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 ad |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE to remind parties of consent conference scheduled at 10:30 AM on Thursday, November 19, 2020; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, the conference will be canceled (ASL) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Cortlin Lee Bond on behalf of O'Neil Transportation Services Inc (Bond, Cortlin) |
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26 - The parties are reminded to conduct a conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The parties must confer no later than 21 days after the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/23/2020. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than December 4, 2020. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after December 4, 2020. A telephone status conference is SET for 10:30 a.m. on November 19, 2020. The parties are DIRECTED to dial 866-390-1828 no less than five minutes before the status conference begins. The access code is 9262283. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/23/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by O'Neil Transportation Services Inc.(Miller, T) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to O'Neil Transportation Services Inc. Mailed certified mail (MEB2) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Jennifer Davis. (Porter, Adam) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3675988. related document #1 COMPLAINT against O'Neil Transportation Services Inc, filed by Jennifer Davis.(KAM). (Porter, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against O'Neil Transportation Services Inc, filed by Jennifer Davis.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. O'Neil Transportation Services Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: O'Neil Transportation Services Inc | |
| Represented By: | T Matthew Miller |
| Represented By: | Cortlin Lee Bond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jennifer Davis | |
| Represented By: | Adam M Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
