Carey v. Social Security Administration et al
| Anterica Carey |
| Department of Labor, Alabama and Social Security Administration |
| 2:2020cv01409 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Defendant's Response to #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Anterica Carey. (Bolton, Andrea) Modified text on 11/4/2020 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 10 Brief re #4 MOTION to Dismiss SSA as a Defendant, #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Social Security Administration. (Pickren, Robert) |
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER- The case is before the court on the Social Security Administration's motion for extension of time and to combine briefs. Doc. #8 . The motion is GRANTED. The combined brief is limited to fifteen pages and is due on or before OCTOBER 27, 2020. Any reply by Plaintiff is limited to ten pages and is due on or before NOVEMBER 4, 2020. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/16/20. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Reply and to Combine Reply and Response Briefs by Social Security Administration. (Pickren, Robert) |
| Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court Responses due by 10/27/2020 Replies due by 11/4/2020. (MRR, ) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER- This case is before the court on Plaintiff's motion to remand. Doc. #6 . Any response by the United States is limited to fifteen pages and is due on or before OCTOBER 27, 2020. Any reply by Plaintiff is limited to ten pages and is due on or before NOVEMBER 4, 2020. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/13/20. (MRR, )
|
| Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION Responses due by 10/27/2020 Replies due by 11/4/2020. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand and Response to Defendant SSA's Motion to Dismiss as Defendant by Anterica Carey. (Majid, Farahbin) Modified text on 10/13/2020 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE- Any response by pltf to the Social Security Administration's Motion to Dismiss SSA (Doc #4 ) is due on or before October 13, 2020; Any reply by deft is due on or before October 20, 2020. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/29/20. (MRR, ) |
| Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION Responses due by 10/13/2020 Replies due by 10/20/2020. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss SSA as a Defendant by Social Security Administration. (Pickren, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Social Security Administration Re: Doc #2 (Blutter, Sarah) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER- The exhibits to the Notice of Removal contain unredacted personal information; The Clerk is DIRECTED to seal the Notice of Removal (Doc. #1 ) The United States of America is ORDERED to file a redacted version of the Notice of Removal in compliance with the Northern District of Alabama's Civil Administrative Procedures Manual. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/23/20. (MRR, )
|
| AMENDED COMPLAINT against Department of Labor, Alabama, Social Security Administration, filed by Anterica Carey.-Deemed filed 11/15/18, Circuit Court of Jefferson County (Doc 1 p.86)(MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 ***SEALED**NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, case number 01-cv-2018-264., filed by Social Security Administration.(MRR, )**SEALED pursuant to Order Doc 2*** on 9/23/2020 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
