George v. Midland Credit Managment Inc
| Abi George |
| Midland Credit Managment Inc |
| 2:2020cv01496 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL- The pltf filed a notice of dismissal before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment (Doc #9 ); It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/29/20. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Abi George (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Abi George of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Abi George. Midland Credit Managment Inc served on 10/5/2020, answer due 10/26/2020. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Managment Inc. Mailed certified mail (MEB2) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: The motion seeking leave for David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps to appear pro hac vice on behalf of the plaintiff (Doc. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/30/20. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford W Botes on behalf of Abi George (Botes, Bradford) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice - David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps Motion is RIPE 9/28/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Abi George. (Attachments: #1 Consent of local counsel)(MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Abi George. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Midland Credit Managment Inc, filed by Abi George. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(MRR, ) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3681483 (B4601108739). (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/29/2020 (MRR, ). |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3681480 (B4601108737). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Midland Credit Managment Inc, filed by Abi George. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(MRR, ). (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/29/2020 (MRR, ). |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3681481 (B4601108738). (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/29/2020 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: George v. Midland Credit Managment Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Abi George | |
| Represented By: | Bradford W Botes |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Credit Managment Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
