Valencia-Torres v. Google LLC et al
| Maria Valencia-Torres |
| Google Payment Corp and Google LLC |
| 2:2020cv01651 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT - The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. The telephone conference set for December 14, 2020 is CANCELLED. Please use case number 2:20-cv-1651-RDP on all subsequent pleadings. (KEK) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to remind parties of consent telephone conference scheduled for 11:00 AM on Monday, 12/14/20; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, by 9:00 A.M. on Monday 12/14/20, the conference will be cancelled. (BST, ) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Maria Valencia-Torres. Google Payment Corp waiver sent on 12/1/2020, answer due 1/30/2021. (Ware, Dargan) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Google LLC. filed by Google LLC (Pewitt, James) |
Filing 6
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than January 8, 2021. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after January 8, 2021. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:00 a.m. on December 14, 2020. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/1/20. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: The parties' joint motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks an extension of time to respond to the complaint. (Doc. #4 ). Google, LLC, SHALL respond to the complaint by January 30, 2021, which will roughly coincide with the responsive pleading deadline for the other defendant, Google Payment Corp., should it waive service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/1/20. (MRR, )
|
| Reset Deadlines: Google LLC answer due 1/30/2021. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time Motion is RIPE 11/24/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp., Maria Valencia-Torres (Pewitt, James) Modified on 11/24/2020 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (MEB2) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Google LLC, Google Payment Corp, filed by Maria Valencia-Torres.(MRR, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3698954 (B4601109216). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Google LLC, Google Payment Corp, filed by Maria Valencia-Torres.(MRR, ). (Ware, Dargan) Modified on 10/22/2020 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
