Johnson v. Jackson et al
Aaron Lamont Johnson |
John Doe Owner of G Unit Films Corporation, John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation, Isiah Wright, Jr and Curtis Jackson |
2:2020cv01710 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER - The telephone conference set for January 5, 2021, is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/22/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: For good cause shown, the #11 Motion to Seal Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Dennis R. Bailey filed in support of Sinclair's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/7/2020. (SUH) |
Filing 11 Second MOTION to Seal Document Exhibit 1 by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. (Bailey, Dennis) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to File Documents under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/2/2020. (KAM) |
Filing 9 ORDER the court reminded the plaintiff that he has 90 days from the date of removal to serve the remaining Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/2/2020. (KAM) |
Filing 8 ORDER that the parties are reminded that this case will be reassigned to a district judge after 1/15/2021 unless they unanimously consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge; Telephone Conference set for 1/5/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden; parties to call as directed; if all parties submit an executed consent before 1/5/2021, the telephone conference will be cancelled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/2/2020. (KAM) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. (Dumas, Royal) |
Filing 6 Brief re #5 MOTION to Dismiss . (Dumas, Royal) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8)(Dumas, Royal) |
Filing 4 ORDER - Before the court is a Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendant Sinclair Television Stations, LLC, improperly identified in the complaint as "John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation." Doc. #3 . The motion asks for an additional 28 days to file a responsive pleading to the complaint. Doc. #3 at 12. The motion is GRANTED. Any responsive pleading by this Defendant shall be filed by December 2, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 11/4/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. (Bailey, Dennis) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. filed by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation (Bailey, J) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3706999 (B4601109389). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama (Bessemer), case number 68-cv-2020-15, filed by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(KEK). (Bailey, J) Modified on 11/2/2020 (MEB2). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama (Bessemer), case number 68-cv-2020-15, filed by John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.