US Specialty Insurance Company v. Mata Electric LLC et al
| US Specialty Insurance Company |
| Erick A Mata Cabrera, Mata Construction LLC, Mata Electric LLC, Tina A Sharpe, Mata Auto LLC, Mata Electrical Contractors & Support LLC, La Perla NayaritaLLC and La Perla Nayarita LLC Birmingham |
| 2:2020cv01722 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| R David Proctor |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. Erick A Mata Cabrera served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. Tina A Sharpe served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. La Perla NayaritaLLC served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. La Perla Nayarita LLC Birmingham served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. Mata Auto LLC served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. Mata Construction LLC served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. Mata Electrical Contractors & Support LLC served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Specialty Insurance Company. Mata Electric LLC served on 12/6/2020, answer due 12/27/2020. (Stiff, L) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants delivered to plaintiff for service. (KAM) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3710349 (B4601109521). related document #1 COMPLAINT for Exoneration of Surety Bond and Injunctive Relief against Erick A Mata Cabrera, La Perla Nayarita LLC Birmingham, La Perla NayaritaLLC, Mata Auto LLC, Mata Construction LLC, Mata Electric LLC, Mata Electrical Contractors & Support LLC, Tina A Sharpe, filed by US Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-D, # 2 Exhibit E, # 3 Exhibit F)(KAM). (Stiff, L) Modified on 11/6/2020 (MEB2). |
Filing 2
ORDER This matter is before the court on the Verified Complaint for Exoneration of Surety and Injunctive Relief filed by Plaintiff U.S. Specialty Insurance Company; The court notes that the body of the Complaint contains an Application for Temporary Restraining Order, but no separate Motion has been filed; the Application contained with the Verified Complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Any further request for the issuance of a temporary restraining order should be made by a separate motion entitled Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/3/2020. (KAM)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Exoneration of Surety Bond and Injunctive Relief against Erick A Mata Cabrera, La Perla Nayarita LLC Birmingham, La Perla NayaritaLLC, Mata Auto LLC, Mata Construction LLC, Mata Electric LLC, Mata Electrical Contractors & Support LLC, Tina A Sharpe, filed by US Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D, #2 Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit F)(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
