Miles v. Paschall Truck Lines Inc. et al
| Charles D Miles |
| James Hartense Codie and Paschall Truck Lines Inc. |
| 2:2020cv01743 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| R David Proctor |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/14/2020. (KAM)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT- The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. Please use case number 2:20 CV 1743 RDP on all subsequent pleadings. (AKD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Paschall Truck Lines Inc.(AKD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Paschall Truck Lines Inc. (AKD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Paschall Truck Lines Inc. from Circuit Court of Jefferson County AL, case number 01-CV-2020-903403.00., filed by Paschall Truck Lines Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(AKD) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601109495 (AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
