McCormick v. Hardy Corporation et al
Gary Lee McCormick |
Tommy Cox, Hardy Corporation, Jim Driskill and Jocelyn Wiggins |
2:2020cv01781 |
November 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Abdul K Kallon |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Hardy Corporation. Delivered to USM with 285 forms. (AKD) |
Filing 5 ORDER re Amended Complaint-Accordingly, and consistent with the courts earlier order, McCormicks ADEA claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. McCormicks race discrimination claim, however, will proceed against Hardy because McCormicks allegations appear to state a claim under Title VII. The clerk is therefore DIRECTED to serve McCormicks amended complaint. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 01/04/2021. (AKD) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hardy Corporation, filed by Gary Lee McCormick.(AKD) |
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel and GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; McCormick is thus ORDERED to file an amended complaint by December 28, 2020. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 11/24/2020. (AKD) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gary Lee McCormick. (AKD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tommy Cox, Jim Driskill, Hardy Corporation, Jocelyn Wiggins, filed by Gary Lee McCormick.(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.