Murray v. Capital Accounts LLC
Plaintiff: Angelica Murray
Defendant: Capital Accounts LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv00076
Filed: January 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Anna M Manasco
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Angelica Murray (Philipps, David)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER. The court STAYS this case until March 31, 2021 or the Plaintiff's filing of a dismissal, whichever occurs first. The court DIRECTS counsel for plaintiff to provide a copy of this TEXT ORDER to counsel for defendant. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 2/18/2021. (FNC)
February 17, 2021 Filing 9 AMENDED NOTICE of Settlement by Angelica Murray (Philipps, David) Modified text on 2/18/2021 (MRR, ).
February 17, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE by Angelica Murray of Settlement (Philipps, David)
February 5, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Angelica Murray. Capital Accounts LLC served on 2/1/2021, answer due 2/22/2021. (MRR, )
January 26, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Capital Accounts LLC, sent via certified mail (MRR, )
January 21, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford W Botes on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Botes, Bradford)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, Doc. #3 , is GRANTED. Counsel are reminded that at least one attorney for each party may be required to be physically present at every hearing and status conference. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 1/20/21. (MRR, )
January 19, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Angelica Murray. (Attachments: #1 Consent of local counsel)(KEK)
January 19, 2021 Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Angelica Murray. (KEK)
January 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital Accounts LLC, filed by Angelica Murray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(KEK)
January 19, 2021 PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3756345 (B4601110894). (Philipps, David) Modified on 1/19/2021 (MEB2).
January 19, 2021 PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3756348 (B4601110895). (Philipps, David) Modified on 1/19/2021 (MEB2).
January 19, 2021 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3756342 (B4601110893). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Capital Accounts LLC, filed by Angelica Murray. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(KEK). (Philipps, David) Modified on 1/19/2021 (MEB2).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murray v. Capital Accounts LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelica Murray
Represented By: Bradford W Botes
Represented By: David J. Philipps
Represented By: Mary Elizabeth Philipps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital Accounts LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?