Williams v. Department of Housing
| Patrick Williams |
| Department of Housing, HUD and Department of Housing Authority |
| 2:2021cv00217 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| John H England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT- The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Annemarie Carney Axon. Please use case number 2:21 CV 217 ACA on all subsequent pleadings. (AKD) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE- Due to the nature of this action and case-specific circumstances, the undersigned has determined he will not be able to obtain consent in this action in a timely manner. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a District Judge for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 03/31/2021. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER- Williams has not yet filed an amended complaint. Williams is ORDERED to do so by March 25, 2021. As previously stated, Williams complaint may be dismissed if he does not correct the deficiencies related to administrative exhaustion and specifically identifying the incidents that are part of his claims against HUD. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 03/11/2021. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER re #4 Amended Complaint filed by Patrick Williams; The amended complaint is basically the same as the original complaint, with many allegations repeated in the exact same words. (Compare #1 with #4 ). Importantly, it does not correct any of the problems identified above.Accordingly, Williams is ORDERED to file an amended complaint, consistent with the instructions above. As previously stated, Williams complaint may be dismissed if he does not correct the deficiencies related to administrative exhaustion and specifically identifying the incidents that are part of his claims against HUD. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 03/01/2021. (AKD)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Department of Housing, HUD, filed by Patrick Williams.(AKD) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint bearing this case number (2:21-cv-00217-JHE) on the first page within twenty-one (21) days from the entry date of this order. The amended complaint must include all of the plaintiffs claims in this action and must not refer back to the original complaint. Only claims set forth in the amended complaint will be considered.Failure to file an amended complaint within the time prescribed may result in the dismissal of all claims for want of prosecution. Service of process will not begin until an amended complaint complying with this order is filed. Because, presently, it is unclear what facts and legal issues are involved in this case, the motion is DENIED to the extent the undersigned declines to appoint an attorney to represent the plaintiff in this action at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 02/12/2021. (AKD)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 2/11/2021. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Patrick Williams. (AKD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Housing, filed by Patrick Williams.(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
