Robinson v. AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff: Roy Thomas Robinson
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc
Case Number: 2:2021cv00309
Filed: February 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Clerk's Minute Entry Dismissal pursuant to Stipulation of Parties: Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties have jointly stipulated to dismissal of this action with prejudice. The parties SHALL bear their own costs and fees. This case was closed on 9/19/2022 and remains CLOSED. (KLL)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION of Dismissal by AT&T Services Inc. filed by AT&T Services Inc (Lee, Leon)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER OF DISMISSAL the court, having been informed that a settlement has been reached, DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE; the parties are DIRECTED to submit a joint stipulation within 60 days. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/19/2022. (KAM)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. IN LIGHT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE COURT AUTHORIZES MEDIATION TO OCCUR BY EITHER VIA TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE, PROVIDED THE MEDIATOR AGREES. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/11/2022. (KAM)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 TEXT ORDER Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery #20 . The Motion #20 is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order #19 is AMENDED as follows: All discovery is to be commenced in time to be completed by November 1, 2022; All potentially dispositive motions should be filed by December 1, 2022. The parties are REMINDED to reference paragraph 6 of the courts Initial Order #13 if discovery disputes continue. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 6/7/2022. (KAM)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery [Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Doc. 16) for both Discovery Cutoff and Dispositive Motion Deadline by Roy Thomas Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AT&T ADEA Document (Showing IIL Persons in Unit), #2 Exhibit "Corrected" AT&T ADEA Document (Showing No Persons in Unit with IIL))(Green, Wilson)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: certain time limits apply as set out in this order; Discovery due by 7/1/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/1/2022. Mediation in July 2022; Pretrial conference ready in January 2023; Non-Jury trial ready in February 2023. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/18/2021. (KAM)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Scheduling Conference held on 11/18/2021. A separate Scheduling Order will be entered by the court. (KLL)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TEXT ORDER Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion to Reset Scheduling Conference #17 . The Motion #17 is GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference originally set for November 17, 2021 at 2:30 PM is RESET for Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 1:00 P.M. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/15/2021. (KAM)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Roy Thomas Robinson. (Green, Wilson)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2021 02:30 PM before Judge R David Proctor. The conference will be held by telephone. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/8/2021. (KAM)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Green, Wilson)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by AT&T Services Inc.(Lee, Leon)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/21/2021. (KAM)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously, #7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/21/2021. (KAM)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/21/2021. (KAM)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY Brief filed by Defendant AT&T Services Inc re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss and supporting memorandum filed by AT&T Services Inc. (Lee, Leon)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss and supporting memorandum filed by Roy Thomas Robinson. (Green, Wilson)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AT&T Services Inc. filed by AT&T Services Inc (Lee, Leon)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss and supporting memorandum by AT&T Services Inc. (Lee, Leon)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Defendants Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #5 of attorney Leon H. Lee, Jr. The Motion #5 is GRANTED. Attorney Leon H. Lee, Jr. is accordingly granted leave to appear pro hac vice in this case. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/23/2021. (KAM)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Leon H. Lee, Jr.) by AT&T Services Inc. (Mays, Stephanie)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3802061. (Mays, Stephanie) NDAL rec# B4601112155 Modified on 3/22/2021 (KAM, ).
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roy Thomas Robinson. AT&T Services Inc served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. (KEK)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AT&T Services Inc. Mailed certified mail. (MEB2)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Roy Thomas Robinson. (KEK)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Services Inc, filed by Roy Thomas Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(KEK)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3785824 (ALND B4601111704) related document #1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Services Inc, filed by Roy Thomas Robinson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(KEK). (Green, Wilson) Modified on 2/26/2021 (KEK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. AT&T Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Thomas Robinson
Represented By: Joseph E Stott
Represented By: Freddie N Harrington, Jr
Represented By: Wilson F Green
Represented By: Wilson Franklin Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc
Represented By: Stephanie H Mays
Represented By: Leon H Lee, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?