Daughtrey v. Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC
Kevin Ray Daughtrey |
Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car |
2:2021cv00328 |
March 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER The - court GRANTS #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey Soble. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 6/14/21. (SAC) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey Soble by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert. Good Standing)(Taylor, Bert) |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3861665 (B4601113983). (Taylor, Bert) Modified on 6/15/2021 (MRR, ). |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC. filed by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC (Taylor, Bert) |
Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER governing further proceedings in this action unless modified for good cause shown: Discovery due by 2/15/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 4/25/2022; Joint Status Report due by 1/14/2022. The parties shall be ready for trial in November 2022, to be scheduled by separate order. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 4/21/21. (SAC) |
Filing 3 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Taylor, Bert) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 3/3/21. (SAC) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3788762. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2020-902840, filed by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(KEK). (Taylor, Bert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2020-902840, filed by Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(KEK) |
State court complaint filed 8/11/2020. See Doc #1 , Exhibit A, pages 1-7. (KEK) |
Answer filed 9/16/2020. See Doc #1 , Exhibit A, pages 31-40. (KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Daughtrey v. Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Enterprise Leasing Company - South Central LLC d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car | |
Represented By: | Bert P Taylor |
Represented By: | Jeffrey A Soble |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Ray Daughtrey | |
Represented By: | Andrew Joseph Moak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.