Hagler et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
| Charles Hagler and Beth Hagler |
| Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson |
| 2:2021cv00554 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Beth Hagler, Charles Hagler. Ethicon Inc waiver sent on 5/20/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. (Rosemore, Evan) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Beth Hagler, Charles Hagler. Johnson & Johnson waiver sent on 5/18/2021, answer due 7/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Waiver - First Amended Complaint)(Rosemore, Evan) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Beth Hagler, Charles Hagler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rosemore, Evan) |
Filing 3
ORDER- The plaintiffs are ORDERED to amend the complaint within fourteen (14) calendar days to correct the deficiencies in the jurisdictional allegations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 5/4/21. (MRR, )
|
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number B4601112859 (MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson, filed by Beth Hagler, Charles Hagler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
