Loyola v. Godber
| Giovanni Loyola |
| Godber |
| 2:2021cv00594 |
| April 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Waiver of Service of Summons filed by Godber. (Gilbert, Jonathan) Modified docket text on 5/28/2021 (MRR, ).
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by John G Dana on behalf of Godber (Dana, John)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan David Gilbert on behalf of Godber (Gilbert, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by James A Stewart on behalf of Godber (Stewart, James)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce L Gordon on behalf of Godber (Gordon, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Giovanni Loyola. Godber served on 5/3/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. (Goldfarb, Jon)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Godber, returned to plaintiff for service (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Godber, filed by Giovanni Loyola.(Goldfarb, Jon)
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3828012 (B4601112951). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Godber, filed by Giovanni Loyola.(KEK). (Goldfarb, Jon) Modified on 4/28/2021 (MRR, ).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Godber, filed by Giovanni Loyola.(KEK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
