Hyde v. Shelby Health Partners et al
Jason Daniel Hyde |
Shelby Health Partners, Frantzy Ceneus and Southern Health Partners |
2:2021cv00816 |
June 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
Corey L Maze |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Jason Daniel Hyde. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 7/12/2021. (SRD) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #5 NOTICE to correct the record. The undersigned construes Hydes notice as a motion to amend the complaint and GRANTS the same. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 7/9/2021. (SRD) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to correct the record by Jason Daniel Hyde (MEB2) |
Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by Jason Daniel Hyde (MEB2) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 6/17/2021. (SRD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Daniel Hyde. (MEB2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frantzy Ceneus, Shelby Health Partners, filed by Jason Daniel Hyde. (MEB2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.