Williams v. Cenlar FSB et al
Plaintiff: Tensia Williams
Defendant: Cenlar FSB and Federal National Mortgage Association
Case Number: 2:2021cv00940
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 2604
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian D Flick on behalf of Tensia Williams (Flick, Brian)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 08/18/2021. (AKD)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than October 1, 2021. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after October 1, 2021. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for September 17, 2021 at 10:30 a.m.. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-873-8017 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 4577302. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 08/18/2021. (AKD)
August 17, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Federal National Mortgage Association.(Premo, Grant)
August 17, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Cenlar FSB.(Premo, Grant)
August 10, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Grant A Premo on behalf of Cenlar FSB, Federal National Mortgage Association (Premo, Grant)
August 10, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna-Katherine Bowman on behalf of Cenlar FSB, Federal National Mortgage Association (Bowman, Anna-Katherine)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants have until August 17, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 08/10/2021. (CLS2)
August 9, 2021 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Motion is RIPE 8/9/2021. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Tensia Williams. (Allums, Stephen)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice attorney Brian D. Flick, but with the understanding and on the condition he pay the applicable fee and register for e-filing and notification within 14 days, unless he has already done so. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 7/28/2021. (AVC)
July 28, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Appear Pro Hac Vice of Brian D. Flick by Tensia Williams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Brian D. Flick, #2 Exhibit 1 Certificates)(Allums, Stephen)
July 28, 2021 PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3893473 (ALND receipt# B4601114876). (Allums, Stephen) Modified on 7/28/2021 (AKD).
July 23, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tensia Williams. Federal National Mortgage Association served (no date on green card). (KEK)
July 13, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Cenlar FSB, Federal National Mortgage Association. Mailed certified mail. (AKD)
July 13, 2021 Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by Tensia Williams. (Allums, Stephen)
July 13, 2021 Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Tensia Williams. (Allums, Stephen)
July 13, 2021 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number B4601114599 (AKD)
July 12, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD)
July 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cenlar FSB, Federal National Mortgage Association, filed by Tensia Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18)(AKD, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Cenlar FSB et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tensia Williams
Represented By: Stephen Scott Allums
Represented By: Brian D Flick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cenlar FSB
Represented By: Anna-Katherine Bowman
Represented By: Grant A Premo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Represented By: Anna-Katherine Bowman
Represented By: Grant A Premo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?