Barber v. Unicom Birmingham LLC
DeVon Barber |
Unicom Birmingham LLC d/b/a Metro By T-Mobile |
2:2021cv00987 |
July 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 4/25/2022. Dispositive motions due by 5/25/2022. Status Conference set for Monday, 5/9/2022 at 11:00 AM, CR 7B, Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL. See Order for other deadlines and directives. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/9/2021. (YMB) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Schatz, David) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Unicom Birmingham LLC.(Hancock, William) |
Filing 5 Summons and Complaint Returned With COVID-19 Notation from Postal Employee on Unicom Birmingham LLC on 7/26/2021 by DeVon Barber. (KAM) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Unicom Birmingham LLC. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
Filing 3 HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 7/20/2021. (KEK) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3887523. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Unicom Birmingham LLC, filed by DeVon Barber.(KEK). (Schatz, David) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by DeVon Barber. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unicom Birmingham LLC, filed by DeVon Barber.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.