Cahill v. Red Clay Technology Group Inc et al
Plaintiff: Chris Cahill
Defendant: Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr and Damon Porrill
Case Number: 2:2021cv00990
Filed: July 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice by Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr. filed by Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr (Penfield, Matthew)
September 16, 2021 Filing 6 SUGGESTION OF DEATH Upon the Record as to Plaintiff Chris Cahill by Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr. filed by Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr (Penfield, Matthew)
August 30, 2021 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Red Clay Technology Group Inc. filed by Red Clay Technology Group Inc (Penfield, Matthew)
August 30, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr.(Penfield, Matthew)
July 26, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 7/21/2021. (KEK)
July 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr, filed by Chris Cahill.(KEK)
July 20, 2021 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3887533. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Damon Porrill, Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr, filed by Chris Cahill.(KEK). (Lowery, Courtney)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cahill v. Red Clay Technology Group Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Cahill
Represented By: Courtney Elizabeth Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Red Clay Technology Group Inc
Represented By: Matthew I Penfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rayburn C Washburn, Jr
Represented By: Matthew I Penfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Damon Porrill
Represented By: Matthew I Penfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?