Holmes v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
| Tonja Holmes |
| Wal-Mart Stores East LP |
| 2:2021cv01064 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Anna M Manasco |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER- Certain deadlines and instructions apply as further set out within including: Joint Status Report due by 4/18/2022, Status Conference set for 4/25/2022 11:30 AM by Zoom, Discovery due by 5/2/2022, Dispositive Motions due by 6/1/2022, Trial ready October 2022. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/28/21. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER PERTAINING TO DISCOVERY MATERIALS PRODUCED BY WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/23/21. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER by Wal-Mart Stores East LP., Tonja Holmes (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wakefield, Deborah) Modified docket text and added filer on 9/23/2021 (MRR, ). |
|
Filing 7
QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/23/21. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Hipaa Order by Wal-Mart Stores East LP., Tonja Holmes (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wakefield, Deborah) Modified to add filer on 9/23/2021 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Wakefield, Deborah) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER Governing All Further Proceedings - with appendices I, II, & III attached. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 9/3/21. (MRR, )
|
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3911039 (B4601115383). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East LP from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2021-901980, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (Attachments: # 1 State Court Complaint, # 2 State Court Summons, # 3 Discovery, # 4 Plaintiff's Demand)(KEK). (Wakefield, Deborah) Modified on 8/26/2021 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (KEK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East LP from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2021-901980, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Summons, #3 Discovery, #4 Plaintiff's Demand)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holmes v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tonja Holmes | |
| Represented By: | Carson Scott Hale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East LP | |
| Represented By: | Deborah Ann Wakefield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
