Pritchett v. Parham et al
| Curtis Lee Pritchett |
| Rodrick Parham and Clemson |
| 2:2021cv01089 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER - Accordingly, having reviewed the materials in the electronic docket, the Court agrees that Mr. Pritchett's allegations in his complaint have no connection to the Northern District of Alabama. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's report and accepts his recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), the Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/15/2021. (KEK)
|
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 8/11/2021. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clemson, Rodrick Parham, filed by Curtis Lee Pritchett.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
