Antinoro v. Buffalo Rock Company et al
Plaintiff: Monica Antinoro
Defendant: Buffalo Rock Company and Charles Gissendanner
Case Number: 2:2021cv01338
Filed: October 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2021 Filing 9 ALIAS Summons Issued as to Charles Gissendanner. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: On October 18, 2021, the court received a return receipt for the summons and complaint sent to Defendant Charles Gissendanner. (Doc. #5 ). The return receipt does not contain a signature but instead reflects that the mail carrier wrote a Covid-19 notation on the signature line. (Id.). This return receipt is insufficient to establish proper service on Mr. Gissendanner. Plaintiff Monica Antinoro may continue efforts to properly serve Mr. Gissendanner within the time limit prescribed in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/5/2021. (KEK)
November 4, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Buffalo Rock Company. filed by Buffalo Rock Company (Morton, Dent)
November 4, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Buffalo Rock Company.(Morton, Dent)
October 18, 2021 Filing 5 Summons and Complaint Returned With COVID-19 Notation from Postal Employee as to Charles Gissendanner by Monica Antinoro. (KEK)
October 18, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Antinoro. Buffalo Rock Company served on 10/14/2021, answer due 11/4/2021. (KEK)
October 12, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Buffalo Rock Company, Charles Gissendanner. Sent via certified mail. (KEK)
October 6, 2021 Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Monica Antinoro. (KEK)
October 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Buffalo Rock Company, Charles Gissendanner, filed by Monica Antinoro.(KEK)
October 6, 2021 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3939577. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Buffalo Rock Company, Charles Gissendanner, filed by Monica Antinoro.(KEK). (Schatz, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antinoro v. Buffalo Rock Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Antinoro
Represented By: David Jeremy Schatz
Represented By: Raymond Christopher Foushee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buffalo Rock Company
Represented By: Gabriell Masterson Jeffreys
Represented By: Dent M Morton
Represented By: Kermit L Kendrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Gissendanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?