Vandergrift v. Eldridge et al
Plaintiff: Shaquawn Vandergrift
Defendant: Christopher Eldridge and Averitt Express Inc
Case Number: 2:2021cv01614
Filed: December 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 INITIAL ORDER; Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/24/2022. (BST, )
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER - The Telephone Conference set for January 20, 2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Staci G. Cornelius is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/20/2022. (MEB2)
January 20, 2022 Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge filed by Averitt Express Inc, Shaquawn Vandergrift, Christopher Eldridge (MEB2)
January 18, 2022 Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Douglas, Danielle)
January 18, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE to remind parties of consent telephone conference scheduled for 11:00 AM on Thursday, 1/20/22; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, the conference will be cancelled. (BST, )
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than February 14, 2022. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after February 14, 2022. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for January 20, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/30/2021. (AKD)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER regarding compliance with Rule 26; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/30/2021. (BST, )
December 29, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Averitt Express Inc.(Douglas, Danielle)
December 21, 2021 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Averitt Express Inc. filed by Averitt Express Inc (Douglas, Danielle)
December 21, 2021 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3982848 (ALND receipt# B4601117572). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Christopher Eldridge from Circuit Court of Shelby County, AL, case number 58 CV 2021-900617.00., filed by Christopher Eldridge. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(AKD). (Douglas, Danielle) Modified on 12/21/2021 (AKD).
December 20, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Christopher Eldridge.(Douglas, Danielle)
December 10, 2021 Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants in response to the Court's Order of December 9, 2021 (doc. 3) from Circuit Court of Shelby County, AL, case number 58-cv-2021-900617. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Joint Amended Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Ex. B to Joint Amended Notice of Removal)(Douglas, Danielle) Modified on 12/13/2021 (AKD).
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER-This court cannot take jurisdiction of this matter until the citizenship of each party is properly alleged. Accordingly, Eldridge is ORDERED to file an amended notice of removal within fourteen (14) calendar days from the entry date of this order, to correct the deficiencies in the jurisdictional allegations discussed herein. The amended notice of removal SHALL be complete and not incorporate by reference or refer back to a previously filed document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/09/2021. (AKD)
December 6, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD)
December 6, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Christopher Eldridge from Circuit Court of Shelby County, AL, case number 58 CV 2021-900617.00., filed by Christopher Eldridge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AKD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vandergrift v. Eldridge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaquawn Vandergrift
Represented By: Michael E Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Eldridge
Represented By: Danielle Elysees Douglas
Represented By: Todd David Engelhardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Averitt Express Inc
Represented By: Danielle Elysees Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?