Merriweather v. United States of America
| William Merriweather, Jr |
| United States of America |
| 2:2021cv08015 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of filing additional documents by William Merriweather, Jr (KAM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - the United States Government has filed a Response to Petitioner's 28:2255 Motion seeking the Motion to be dismissed; Petitioner shall have twenty days to respond. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 6/4/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss Merriweather's Motion Pursuant to 28 USC Section 2255 by United States of America. (Simpson, William)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE United States is DIRECTED to appear and SHOW CAUSE in writing, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, why the relief requested by Petitioner should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 6/9/2021; Petitioners Request for Appointment of Counsel #2 is DENIED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 5/20/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by William Merriweather, Jr. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by William Merriweather, Jr.(KAM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
