Bateman v. Murray
| Nathan Parke Bateman |
| Sheriff Bill Murray |
| 2:2022cv00070 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| John H England |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Mail #8 Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Nathan Parke Bateman RTS Not Incarcerated (AHI) |
Filing 10
ORDER: the Clerk is DIRECTED to resend a copy of documents 5 and 8 to the petitioner at St. Clair County Jail, 219 7th Avenue, Ashville, AL 35953 and FURTHER DIRECTED to update the docket to reflect this address. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/4/22. (BJL)
|
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail - Doc 5 - sent to Nathan Parke Bateman. (BJL) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Petitioner had 21 days from the entry date of this order to respond to respondent's response to petitioner's petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/3/2022. (AHI)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Bill Murray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit B-1, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit C-1, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit D-1, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, #13 Exhibit J, #14 Exhibit J-1, #15 Exhibit K, #16 Exhibit L, #17 Exhibit M, #18 Exhibit M-1, #19 Exhibit N, #20 Exhibit O, #21 Exhibit P, #22 Exhibit Q, #23 Exhibit Q-1, #24 Exhibit R, #25 Exhibit S, #26 Exhibit T, #27 Exhibit U)(Poe, Beth) |
| Motion of respondent treating the #7 Response as a MOTION for Summary Judgment pursuant to #8 Order. (AHI) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE In Opposition to Respondent's #4 MOTION for Enlargement of Time filed by Nathan Parke Bateman. (AHI) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and respondent's response is due by 3/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/18/2022. (AHI)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Bill Murray. (Poe, Beth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Beth Slate Poe on behalf of Bill Murray (Poe, Beth) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Respondent is to appear and show cause in writing within 30 days why the relief the petitioner requested should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 1/20/2022. (AHI)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 Receipt Number: B4601118029) filed by Nathan Parke Bateman.(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bateman v. Murray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Nathan Parke Bateman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sheriff Bill Murray | |
| Represented By: | Beth Slate Poe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
