Marquez v. Gaines et al
Julio C Marquez |
Raymond Gaines, Lett and Fleeton |
2:2022cv00394 |
March 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Herman N Johnson |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Based on the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS the court DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Marquez's failure to prosecute his claims. Objections to R&R due by 6/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 5/24/2022. (KEK) |
Filing 3 ORDER - The plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. #2 ). The application is deficient for the following reason: Although the plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, he did not attach a certified copy of his jail or prison account statements for the last six months. The plaintiff must correct this deficiency within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 4/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Julio C Marquez. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fleeton, Raymond Gaines, Lett, filed by Julio C Marquez.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.